By Zech Sindt
On January 13, my wife and I attended a Fillmore and Houston County Republicans event in Mabel featuring several Republican candidates seeking the party’s endorsement for governor. The event gave voters an opportunity to hear directly from the candidates, without sound bites, commercials, or filtered messaging. What stood out was not that the candidates disagreed on values. On most core issues, they largely agreed. What differed was how they approached the problems facing Minnesota and how they proposed fixing them.
Chris Madel framed his campaign around accountability, fraud enforcement, public safety and restoring trust in government. Drawing on his background as an attorney, Madel focused heavily on process, law and consequences. He argued that large scale fraud has not only drained taxpayer dollars, but has eroded confidence in government itself. On public safety, he emphasized direct support for law enforcement and criticized what he described as politically motivated prosecutions. His message was structured, legalistic and direct, appealing to voters who prioritize enforcement, transparency and institutional repair.
Kendall Qualls spoke from a strategic and constitutional perspective, emphasizing electability and the need to win statewide races. He framed the governor’s race as part of a broader effort to regain control of state government and reverse long term policy trends. Qualls focused less on policy specifics and more on coalition building, discipline, and the necessity of winning over voters beyond the Republican base. His message centered on leadership, unity and restoring constitutional principles through electoral success.
Mike Lindell delivered a message rooted in faith, personal experience and cultural restoration. He spoke about Minnesota’s moral direction, welfare reform, public safety and the need to confront fraud and disorder directly. Lindell emphasized bold action and common sense solutions, particularly regarding crime and protests. His presentation was personal and values driven, appealing to voters who believe Minnesota’s problems stem from cultural and moral decline rather than policy mechanics alone.
Peggy Bennett presented herself as a pragmatic conservative focused on solutions rather than rhetoric. Drawing on her background as a long time educator and legislator, Bennett emphasized trust, fiscal restraint and practical governance. She highlighted her willingness to vote against legislation, including bills supported by her own party, when she believed they would harm schools, small businesses or seniors. Bennett argued that Republicans must nominate candidates who can win suburban and metro voters without abandoning conservative principles.
Phillip Parrish focused on government transparency, fraud exposure, and political independence. He emphasized his role as an early whistleblower on fraud in Minnesota and spoke about the dangers of excessive partisanship. Parrish argued that many Minnesotans are looking for leaders who prioritize truth, accountability and right versus wrong over party labels. His message was directed at voters who feel alienated from both major parties and are seeking systemic reform.
Jeff Johnson concentrated on refugee resettlement, local control and fiscal responsibility. He recounted his experience on the St. Cloud City Council and his efforts to push back against federally driven resettlement decisions without sufficient local input. Johnson argued that unchecked spending and taxation are symptoms of a larger governance problem and called for stricter adherence to federal law and greater respect for local communities.
Patrick Knight offered a policy heavy presentation focused on fundamentals such as affordability, education outcomes, public safety and economic growth. Drawing on his military and business background, Knight argued that Minnesota has drifted away from effective governance and needs to return to basics. His message emphasized long term structural reform rather than quick fixes, appealing to voters interested in detailed planning and measurable outcomes.
Brad Kohler centered his remarks on tax reduction, business growth and natural resource development. He argued that Minnesota’s tax burden is driving businesses and workers out of the state and proposed eliminating or significantly reducing business and property taxes. Kohler emphasized economic expansion through mining, energy development and incentives for job creation as a path toward restoring affordability and opportunity.
Taken together, the evening highlighted a Republican field that largely agrees on what is broken in Minnesota but differs on how to fix it and how aggressively to pursue change. For voters, the primary will come down less to ideology and more to temperament, competence and confidence in execution.
Leave a Reply