By Ben Bisbach
Monday, June 10 was a beautiful sunny day. I was looking forward to working in the garden that evening after I got done with work. However when I checked my email that morning, I realized I would need to spend my evening doing something else.
Apparently, a few residents over in Harmony have taken deep offense to the fact that there are books about gay people in the Harmony Public Library. Not only that, but these books are accessible to children. The Harmony Library does not ban or remove books, and it is backed up in that stance by basic American values including freedom of speech, freedom of expression, and the marketplace of ideas, as well as a recently passed Minnesota state law which prohibits the censorship of material in public and school libraries.
That has not deterred these citizens from expressing their displeasure. So instead of a nice evening in the yard, I went to join them at the Harmony Library Board meeting.
Laws which ban or remove books from libraries and schools have become extremely fashionable on the political right in the last few years. Led by Republican politicians, a great many conservative states have jumped on the bandwagon, censoring books with ideas that offend them. Most often, it is books about racism or books with gay or transgender characters that are targeted. The politicians pushing this stuff know exactly what they are doing – they are sowing division and weaponizing prejudice as a political tool, to mask the fact that they have little else to offer. The great irony of all this is that these are the same people howling that “cancel culture has run amok, everyone is too sensitive, everyone is too easily offended.” They go around calling others “snowflakes,” but when confronted with ideas they themselves disagree with, they melt and demand the government protect them from any discomfort or offense.
As the book opponents spoke, the specific reason for their opposition became clear. To them, any mention of queer people at all is automatically obscene. In their worldview, a children’s book about a kid who has two moms or two dads is inherently sexual. A book about a teenager coming out as gay is X-rated, adults only content. Any book that has any queer characters whatsoever is inappropriate for children, or inappropriate to be in a library at all. This is old-school, 20th century homophobia – this idea that the mere existence of gay people is an X-rated concept that only a mature adult can grapple with.
But why does it matter? In the age of the internet, only the most naive adult would imagine the library is a kid’s only source of information. It matters because the 11 or 12 year old who is starting to realize he may be gay, or the 16 or 17 year old who knows he is, is seeing his community debate whether people like him are “inappropriate.” He is listening as his neighbors express their horror that their kids might learn people like him exist. He is watching as entire states ban books about people like him so his peers won’t be exposed to… people like him. What is that teaching that kid about himself?
And that in fact is what these book wars are really about. Its not just about literal access to a book. It’s an attempt to reinforce the stigma against being queer, free speech and the 1st Amendment be damned. The book opponents see a society today in which gay and trans people are more visible, integrated, and accepted than ever before. They want to put the genie of tolerance and love and basic human decency back into the bottle. They want to turn back the clock to an imaginary past where we didn’t exist.
They will fail. In Harmony Minn., as rural as anywhere, the book opponents were outnumbered by book supporters by about 3 to 1. But in this period of backlash it will take all of us who value tolerance, kindness, openness, freedom of expression, and just plain old freedom, to speak up as loudly as those who feel entitled to impose their prejudice on everyone.
Anonymous says
Many thanks for your insightful and compassionate article and the two comments so far that amplify your message.
We are reminded that book burnings were a prominent feature of the Nazi takeover of Germany in the 1920s through the 1940s, intended to limit the people’s access to any information that might run contrary to the “company line.”
Books written by or about LGBTQ+ individuals are not the only examples of books that have been banned, however.
“The Absolutely True Diary of a Part Time Indian” by Sherman Alexie is an excellent book, describing in detail the challenges facing a First Nation person who decides to leave the reservation to try to forge a life in the larger world.
“The Handmaid’s Tale” by Margaret Atwood, which describes the world and all women “know their place.”.
Here are a few more familiar titles from the most challenged and banned books, provided by Goodreads in 2022…
“Lord of the Rings” by J. R. Tolkien
“1984” and “Animal Farm” by George Orwell
“To Kill a Mockingbird” by Harper Lee
“The Great Gatsby” and “Tender is the Night” by F. Scott Fitzgerald (a Minnesota native)
“Schindler’s List” by Thomas Keneally
“Ethan Frome” and “The Age of Innocence” by Edith Wharton
“A Farewell to Arms”, “For Whom the Bell Tolls”, “The Sun Also Rises” and “The Old Man and the Sea” by Ernest Hemingway
“The Jungle” by Upton Sinclair
“Catch 22” by Joseph Heller
“Gone with the Wind” by Margaret Mitchell
“O Pioneers”, “My Antonia” and “Death Comes to the Archbishop” by Willa Cather
“Of Mice and Men” and “Grapes of Wrath” by John Steinbeck
“Babbitt” and “Main Street” by Sinclair Lewis, Minnesota native and 1st U. S. recipient of the Nobel Prize in Literature
“Catcher in the Rye” by J. D. Salinger
“Charlotte’s Web” by E. B. White
“The Wizard of Oz” by L. Frank Baum
“The Call of the Wild” by Jack London
“The Maltese Falcon” by Dashiell Hammett
If anyone would like to see the entire list, here’s the webpage address: https://www.goodreads.com/list/show/74448.Banned_Challenged_Classics
To complete the job, all content circulating via the internet needs to be closely monitored, as well as broadcast and cable television, radio, and all forms of electronic communication, including social media. Perhaps its just me, but that sounds much like current practices in Russia, China, Hungary, North Korea and Saudi Arabia, for starters.
The aforementioned will likely comprise the wish list of many readers of the Fillmore County Journal, those who would love to surrender their freedoms to those whose favor they seek. Hopefully more than a few would think much differently of such a sea change in the lives of all of us.
We all have the opportunity to decide the kind of world in which we want to live.
We must not allow that precious opportunity to go to waste.
I would implore us all to contemplate the sage words of from almost a century ago, which perhaps ring even more true now than ever…
“When liberty is taken away by force it can be restored by force. When it is relinquished voluntarily by default it can never be recovered.” — Dorothy Thompson, (1893-1961), American journalist and radio broadcaster who in 1939 was recognized by Time magazine as the second most influential woman in the United States, trailing only Eleanor Roosevelt
Jon Trouten says
I grew up in Harmony back in the 80s and would’ve loved as a closeted gay teen for there to be more LGBTQ content at the library back then. The handful of books that I was able to find back then didn’t make me gay, but it did provide some sort of lifeline to the outside world, not to mention education for how to keep myself safe. Good for Ben and others like him who pushed back against efforts to make gay people invisible in Fillmore County.
Greg Rendahl says
Thank you for your thoughtful words.