"Where Fillmore County News Comes First"
Online Edition
Thursday, May 23rd, 2013
Volume ∞ Issue ∞
- 11:44:26, May 21st 2013 - airmaxs52274 - Have you ever thought about adding a little bit more than just your a ... [Read More]
- 5:56:33, May 18th 2013 - modgudur - I guess the child is anti-gun control since Obama went to all that trouble ... [Read More]
- 9:27:41, May 16th 2013 - caal girl - Nice outfit on you. I loved some of the dresses but am holding my breath ... [Read More]
- 2:03:34, May 14th 2013 - - Thanks for sharing the trip with us! ... [Read More]
- 4:12:01, May 9th 2013 - Amanda Ziebell - Wow! Thanks to the Fillmore County Journal for this kind story. For a ... [Read More]
- 11:47:30, May 7th 2013 - EW - ramble.....ramble.....ramble..... ... [Read More]
- 10:25:25, May 7th 2013 - Thunder6 - Great article! I love to see the Youth of Fillmore County receiveing acco ... [Read More]
- 6:52:10, May 6th 2013 - Jason Sethre, Publisher of Fillmore County Journal & Olmsted County Journal - Maryh, ... [Read More]
- 7:29:56, May 5th 2013 - maryh - Where are OCJ's available for pickup...other than at the new office? ... [Read More]
- 2:41:47, May 3rd 2013 - Remark1976 - Mrs. Buckbee, I just looked up Senate File 796 and in it there are said p ... [Read More]
Silica sand mining voted down
Mon, Mar 18th, 2013
Posted in All Agriculture
Posted in All Agriculture
Comments
By Andy Seifert
On Wednesday, March 12, St. Charles City Council mayor William Spitzer motioned against three annexation petitions seeking to designate land for a frac sand processing plant. Council Members voted unanimously for a resolution setting up formal opposition to the annexation.
Before making the motion, Spitzer said, “Our number one priority has been to seek answers and ask questions about a subject we were not familiar with … the matter has not been taken lightly.”
St. Charles has heard a lot about silica sand mining over the past year. It’s been in the news, discussed in public and featured in many meetings. Mayo Clinic Dr. Wayne Feyereisn spoke about the issue from a medical perspective.
Spitzer explained that the St. Charles Township did not support the annexation and therefore felt that denying the petitions was the responsible reaction for the City. “The City seeks to maintain positive relations with the Township and County,” he said.
After the resolution opposing the annexation had been passed, Concerned Citizens for St. Charles spokesperson Travis Lange addressed city council and said, “On behalf of Concerned Citizens, thank you very much.” Concerned Citizens for St. Charles, a group opposing silica sand mining from the onset, have played an active role in communicating with the public and with Council Members.
But one St. Charles citizen argued that Concerned Citizens had developed in fear and spread misinformation. The individual was concerned that the multi modal frac sand and transportation facility representatives never received a chance to address the issue.
Nonetheless, having taken a side on the highly debated issue, Council Members moved on with the meeting. “We are all in this together,” the mayor had explained, “It’s important we make strides toward making ourselves a positive destination.”
On Wednesday, March 12, St. Charles City Council mayor William Spitzer motioned against three annexation petitions seeking to designate land for a frac sand processing plant. Council Members voted unanimously for a resolution setting up formal opposition to the annexation.
Before making the motion, Spitzer said, “Our number one priority has been to seek answers and ask questions about a subject we were not familiar with … the matter has not been taken lightly.”
St. Charles has heard a lot about silica sand mining over the past year. It’s been in the news, discussed in public and featured in many meetings. Mayo Clinic Dr. Wayne Feyereisn spoke about the issue from a medical perspective.
Spitzer explained that the St. Charles Township did not support the annexation and therefore felt that denying the petitions was the responsible reaction for the City. “The City seeks to maintain positive relations with the Township and County,” he said.
After the resolution opposing the annexation had been passed, Concerned Citizens for St. Charles spokesperson Travis Lange addressed city council and said, “On behalf of Concerned Citizens, thank you very much.” Concerned Citizens for St. Charles, a group opposing silica sand mining from the onset, have played an active role in communicating with the public and with Council Members.
But one St. Charles citizen argued that Concerned Citizens had developed in fear and spread misinformation. The individual was concerned that the multi modal frac sand and transportation facility representatives never received a chance to address the issue.
Nonetheless, having taken a side on the highly debated issue, Council Members moved on with the meeting. “We are all in this together,” the mayor had explained, “It’s important we make strides toward making ourselves a positive destination.”










