"Where Fillmore County News Comes First"
Online Edition
Tuesday, May 21st, 2013
Volume ∞ Issue ∞
- 11:44:26, May 21st 2013 - airmaxs52274 - Have you ever thought about adding a little bit more than just your a ... [Read More]
- 5:56:33, May 18th 2013 - modgudur - I guess the child is anti-gun control since Obama went to all that trouble ... [Read More]
- 9:27:41, May 16th 2013 - caal girl - Nice outfit on you. I loved some of the dresses but am holding my breath ... [Read More]
- 2:03:34, May 14th 2013 - - Thanks for sharing the trip with us! ... [Read More]
- 4:12:01, May 9th 2013 - Amanda Ziebell - Wow! Thanks to the Fillmore County Journal for this kind story. For a ... [Read More]
- 11:47:30, May 7th 2013 - EW - ramble.....ramble.....ramble..... ... [Read More]
- 10:25:25, May 7th 2013 - Thunder6 - Great article! I love to see the Youth of Fillmore County receiveing acco ... [Read More]
- 6:52:10, May 6th 2013 - Jason Sethre, Publisher of Fillmore County Journal & Olmsted County Journal - Maryh, ... [Read More]
- 7:29:56, May 5th 2013 - maryh - Where are OCJ's available for pickup...other than at the new office? ... [Read More]
- 2:41:47, May 3rd 2013 - Remark1976 - Mrs. Buckbee, I just looked up Senate File 796 and in it there are said p ... [Read More]
“Don’t be short-sighted”
Mon, Sep 16th, 2002
Posted in Features
Posted in Features
Comments
Quote of the week: "It doesn’t make sense to build a five-year-into-the-future project and pay for it for 20 years!" Commissioner Harry Root
The county commissioners wrangled with the courthouse project again last week, and while the architect announced that he was at the end of the schematic design phase of his work, the commissioners still could not reach a decision on the scope of the project.
With the final schematic drawings before them, including the most detailed cost estimates to date, with separate add-on components priced in detail and a tentative schedule in hand, the commissioners chose to postpone a decision for at least two more weeks, at which time they will meet with a bonding company.
The complete project, as presented by the architect, David Kane and the construction manager, Dean Sand, would cost about $4.1 million and, according to the designers, meet the county’s needs for at least the next 20 to 30 years.
When the final schematic drawings were presented, several of the commissioners began to pick apart locations of specific offices shown on the drawings, and seemed to focus their attention on micro details such as in which room a computer might be placed within the Information Technology department.
While those details seemed to be necessary to enhance discussions on the efficient use of existing storage space, clearly the issue which both the construction design team and the staff waited for resolution was whether the board would proceed with the complete project as defined in the schematic drawings.
When Chairman Bakke began to ask if the mechanical equipment room could be moved to accommodate the county attorney’s office in the basement of the proposed new wing, Mr. Kane reminded the commissioners of the process that had brought them to this point.
"I remind you that this was carefully designed with staff and the courts input…pull out a piece and efficiency falls," stated Mr. Kane.
Commissioner Root, with the same confidence he displayed 16 months ago when he made the motion to have the county remodel the courthouse, strongly argued that it is important to build for the future.
"Don’t be short-sighted," Mr. Root told his fellow commissioners. "What is the loan rate, three percent?" the commissioner asked as he argued that it didn’t make sense to finance a project for 20 years if it only met the county’s needs for the next five years.
Even Chairman Bakke admitted that now was a great time to build the project and suggested the board meet with a bonding company for detailed financial information including a payment structure and the cost of a bond to individual taxpayers.
Before the discussion ended, Commissioners Root and Bicknese were able to get a motion passed that instructed Mr. Kane to begin the next phase—design development—but only with an emphasis on the mechanical system.
While the motion passed unanimously, it appeared from the discussion that at least two of the commissioners—Dahl and Bakke—had not yet made up their minds on the scope of the project.









