"Where Fillmore County News Comes First"
Online Edition
Wednesday, May 22nd, 2013
Volume ∞ Issue ∞
- 11:44:26, May 21st 2013 - airmaxs52274 - Have you ever thought about adding a little bit more than just your a ... [Read More]
- 5:56:33, May 18th 2013 - modgudur - I guess the child is anti-gun control since Obama went to all that trouble ... [Read More]
- 9:27:41, May 16th 2013 - caal girl - Nice outfit on you. I loved some of the dresses but am holding my breath ... [Read More]
- 2:03:34, May 14th 2013 - - Thanks for sharing the trip with us! ... [Read More]
- 4:12:01, May 9th 2013 - Amanda Ziebell - Wow! Thanks to the Fillmore County Journal for this kind story. For a ... [Read More]
- 11:47:30, May 7th 2013 - EW - ramble.....ramble.....ramble..... ... [Read More]
- 10:25:25, May 7th 2013 - Thunder6 - Great article! I love to see the Youth of Fillmore County receiveing acco ... [Read More]
- 6:52:10, May 6th 2013 - Jason Sethre, Publisher of Fillmore County Journal & Olmsted County Journal - Maryh, ... [Read More]
- 7:29:56, May 5th 2013 - maryh - Where are OCJ's available for pickup...other than at the new office? ... [Read More]
- 2:41:47, May 3rd 2013 - Remark1976 - Mrs. Buckbee, I just looked up Senate File 796 and in it there are said p ... [Read More]
To the Editor,
Fri, Oct 11th, 2002
Posted in Letter to the Editor
Posted in Letter to the Editor
Comments
Heartland Energy and Recycling's proposed plant may be the state of the art in tire recycling technology. However, no power plant has ever continuously burned 100% tire-derived fuel (TDF) to produce electricity. The manufacturer of the fluidized bed boiler has tested the technology in a small-scale model in a controlled environment. The MPCA has run air dispersion modeling using SCREEN3 a computer program that extrapolates data in a theoretical manner. The population of the Preston area will essentially be a test case for the proposed facility, just as the residents of St. Paul were test cases for ethanol plants.
It appears that the developer is amending his environmental assessment worksheet (EAW) before the comment period has ended. The EAW states that there will be 44,000 gallons per day of wastewater discharge to Preston's wastewater treatment facility. The developer now says that the discharge will only amount to 45 gallons per minute (14,400 gallons per day). Does he really have a plan? How can he be allowed to avoid doing an environmental impact statement (EIS) by amending his EAW during the comment period?
The EAW states that the fuel bunker will be uncovered, allowing precipitation to flow through the TDF and into a storm water detention basin. In recent weeks, that statement has been amended, and the developer now says the fuel bunker will be "enclosed." Once again, how can he amend his EAW before the comment period has ended?
Plant construction and operation may take away as many dollars as it puts into the local economy by negatively impacting tourism and real estate values.
The fact that one of the investors has lived in the Preston area for 65 years does not validate the Heartland Energy proposal. What is the track record of this developer? How have this investor's previous endeavors benefitted the community? Who are the other investors?
Barb Barrett
Preston, MN









