"Where Fillmore County News Comes First"
Online Edition
Wednesday, June 19th, 2013
Volume ∞ Issue ∞
- 8:58:04, Jun 18th 2013 - cabraden1 - I salute you Colonel Overland. Your were my c.o. at Rockville Naval Air ... [Read More]
- 7:10:46, Jun 13th 2013 - chipperlee - Seems to be a well written article, except maybe Silica Sand is used in ... [Read More]
- 12:02:15, Jun 9th 2013 - getthefacts - The problem here lies in the fact that girls were repeatedly told "if y ... [Read More]
- 10:45:32, Jun 7th 2013 - Jo mom for 6yrs - Mr. Ehler hit the nail on the head. I agree with the religious con ... [Read More]
- 2:47:58, Jun 7th 2013 - hello - Hello, it's time you wake up. There isn't a community nearby that doesn't offe ... [Read More]
- 9:06:21, Jun 6th 2013 - hello - Hello, it's time you wake up. There isn't a community nearby that doesn't offe ... [Read More]
- 2:05:29, Jun 6th 2013 - Kim Wentworth - The number one rule in a debate: 1) if the person from the opposite si ... [Read More]
- 12:42:18, Jun 4th 2013 - EW - For someone that is always spouting religious rhetoric, you try to come off as a ... [Read More]
- 11:32:18, May 31st 2013 - JO PLAYER - This is unfair to us girls. Morrie Miller is not getting canceled but J ... [Read More]
- 8:25:34, May 29th 2013 - RP - Why is Mr. Ehler involving himself with non-school activities? Is he going after ... [Read More]
33
Do you think the use of all fireworks should be legal in the state of Minnesota for all consumers?
Commissioners’ Report: Zoning violation - No means No
Mon, Oct 14th, 2002
Posted in Features
Posted in Features
Comments
At last Tuesday’s meeting, county Zoning Administrator Norm Craig and County Attorney Matt Opat reported a zoning ordinance violation near Canton.
Earlier this summer, Eli Slabaugh, of Canton, requested a variance from the county to build his home just 300 feet from a rock quarry. The County Board of Adjustment denied the request, stating that county ordinance requires a set back of 1000 feet from a rock quarry for safety reasons.
Administrator Craig spoke with Mr. Slabaugh and his father later that week, “They wanted to negotiate, but regardless, they said they would build anyway.”
Mr. Opat explained that any applicant whose variance has been denied has the right to appeal the decision to the District Court. Mr. Craig said that the Slabaughs have consulted legal counsel, however, no appeal has been filed.
This week, Mr. Craig was surprised to find a new house and foundation had been almost completed in the exact spot Mr. Slabaugh was told not to build.
Amazed at the speed of the construction, Mr. Craig said, “There wasn’t a house there ten days ago.”
By ignoring the decision of the Board, Mr. Slabaugh is allegedly in violation of the county zoning ordinance which prohibits building without a permit and building in a restricted area.
Commissioner Randy Dahl asked, “He has about 10 acres there, couldn’t he have moved the house back? Was there a hardship involved?”
“Mr. Slabaugh viewed it as a hardship,” Norm Craig explained. “There is a well located on the site and he doesn’t want to invest in a bigger motor to pump the water from the well.” Mr. Craig confirmed that there was plenty of room to build the house elsewhere on the property.
Commissioners Duane Bakke and Dahl asked if this is considered an “existing building site”.
“That rule doesn’t apply,” Mr. Craig explained. “Construction of a new dwelling has to be at least 1000 feet back from a rock quarry.”
“The Board can now choose to proceed with criminal and civil action,” explained County Attorney Matt Opat, “We can charge criminally. Any violation of a zoning ordinance is a misdemeanor. Civil action would be to ask the Court for an injunction to stop construction and to issue a restraining order on the property until a decision is made by the Court.”
Mr. Opat noted that this legal action would incur some fees to the county.
“We don’t have a choice here,” Chairman Bakke concluded. “It’s in the ordinance. It’s as simple as that.”
Commissioner Marc Prestby agreed, “We have to send a message.”
The Board gave permission to Mr. Opat to “proceed with whatever they need to do.” Mr. Opat later stated that papers are being processed for both civil and criminal actions.
Chairman Bakke also suggested that when a variance is denied, the applicant should receive information in the denial letter on how to properly appeal the ruling.






