"Where Fillmore County News Comes First"
Monday, February 8th, 2016
Volume ∞ Issue ∞
- 7:41:46, Feb 7th 2016 - DeerHunterguy - @Terbeest Calling someone who supports Obama like "a follower of Nazi ... [Read More]
- 6:58:19, Feb 7th 2016 - VikeFan1 - Another angry, rambling rant from a bitter right wingnut. Who is this guy? ... [Read More]
- 12:35:24, Feb 7th 2016 - Slate7 - Looks like the flood destroyed Rushford after all. What happened to the stro ... [Read More]
- 5:15:31, Feb 6th 2016 - @respect - "They don't go out of their way to disrespect until disrespect is thrown at ... [Read More]
- 3:28:56, Feb 6th 2016 - Farmer - WOW! Hope you have more life jackets because now that you have actually put y ... [Read More]
- 12:16:49, Feb 6th 2016 - EagleGolfer - @Mr. Terbeest Oh, yeah, I get it. All those Chicago gang killings ov ... [Read More]
- 11:38:29, Feb 6th 2016 - SV85 - @Hawkeye63 Okay, I got it. You never have written a signed commentary to the ... [Read More]
- 10:44:04, Feb 6th 2016 - - Such drama. JUMP, I have a spare life jacket I'll give you for free. ... [Read More]
- 4:32:19, Feb 6th 2016 - Hawkeye63 - Mr. Terbeest, You have described the modus operando of the ultra liberal c ... [Read More]
- 8:40:46, Feb 5th 2016 - - Not quite like that, the ship can sail any way it wishes but why am I forced to pay ... [Read More]
Fri, Aug 15th, 2003
Posted in Features
Posted in Features
The first jury trial to take place in the temporary courtroom set up in Chatfield City Hall will concern a suit brought by Mark Schumann, Jim Start and 40 other citizens from Ostrander against former Ostrander mayor Victor Feine and former council members Kenneth Shaw and John Schraeder. The trial started last Thursday and is expected to take two days.
In the suit, the plaintiffs contend that Feine, Shaw and Schraeder violated the Minnesota Open Meeting Law by meeting in a series of one on one encounters by phone or in person to discuss the termination of Ostrander city employee Darrell Berg. When the December 3, 2001 Ostrander Council Meeting was held, a letter from each of the three elected officials calling for Berg’s dismissal as a city employee was presented. Council member Merlin Christenson, who was not at the December 3 meeting, and council member Marjorie Hebrink were not consulted by any of the three defendants about the plan to discharge Berg in advance of the December 3 meeting. According to court documents, the plaintiffs allege that there were four interactions between mayor Feine and council member Schraeder, and two between Feine and Shaw, discussing Berg’s termination prior to the December 3 meeting. In a motion for a summary judgement in the case, Attorney David Joerg representing the plaintiffs wrote: “The so-called “quorum rule” does not apply in this case because Feine’s serial meetings with defendants were accomplished for the purposes of avoiding public discussion and discourse, and for forging a majority in advance of the December 3, 2001 council meeting on the issue of Darrell Berg’s discharge.” Joerg also argued that the actions by the defendants constituted a vote in secret to terminate Berg. The Minnesota Open Meeting Law states clearly that meetings of public governing bodies must be open to the public. In hearing the case, the jury must find that the defendants met in a number of serial meetings of less than a quorum for the purpose of avoiding public input. If found guilty, the court could impose sanctions and require the three defendants to pay attorney fees and court costs. Attorney Daniel Heuel of O’Brien and Wolf law firm in Rochester is representing the three defendants.