"Where Fillmore County News Comes First"
Online Edition
Wednesday, June 19th, 2013
Volume ∞ Issue ∞
- 8:58:04, Jun 18th 2013 - cabraden1 - I salute you Colonel Overland. Your were my c.o. at Rockville Naval Air ... [Read More]
- 7:10:46, Jun 13th 2013 - chipperlee - Seems to be a well written article, except maybe Silica Sand is used in ... [Read More]
- 12:02:15, Jun 9th 2013 - getthefacts - The problem here lies in the fact that girls were repeatedly told "if y ... [Read More]
- 10:45:32, Jun 7th 2013 - Jo mom for 6yrs - Mr. Ehler hit the nail on the head. I agree with the religious con ... [Read More]
- 2:47:58, Jun 7th 2013 - hello - Hello, it's time you wake up. There isn't a community nearby that doesn't offe ... [Read More]
- 9:06:21, Jun 6th 2013 - hello - Hello, it's time you wake up. There isn't a community nearby that doesn't offe ... [Read More]
- 2:05:29, Jun 6th 2013 - Kim Wentworth - The number one rule in a debate: 1) if the person from the opposite si ... [Read More]
- 12:42:18, Jun 4th 2013 - EW - For someone that is always spouting religious rhetoric, you try to come off as a ... [Read More]
- 11:32:18, May 31st 2013 - JO PLAYER - This is unfair to us girls. Morrie Miller is not getting canceled but J ... [Read More]
- 8:25:34, May 29th 2013 - RP - Why is Mr. Ehler involving himself with non-school activities? Is he going after ... [Read More]
33
Do you think the use of all fireworks should be legal in the state of Minnesota for all consumers?
Summons – ELIZABETH VICTORIA GAVRILOAIA
Fri, Nov 5th, 2004
Posted in Legals
Posted in Legals
Comments
State of Minnesota
County of fillmore
in district court
Third judicial District
Civil court division
File No. C9-04-595
SUMMONS
ELIZABETH VICTORIA GAVRILOAIA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
STEVEN ERICKSON; DEBORAH ERICKSON; OLIVER MOEN; SELMA MOEN; also, the unknown heirs of any of the hereinbefore named defendants who may be deceased; also, all other persons or parties unknown, claiming any right, title, estate, interest or lien in the real estate described in the Complaint herein,
Defendants.
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA TO THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANTS: YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to serve upon plaintiff’s attorney an Answer to the Complaint which is herewith served upon you, the original of which is on file in the Office of the Court Administrator of the above named Court, within twenty (20) days after service of this Summons upon you exclusive of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgment by default will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the Complaint.
This action involves, affects, or brings in question real property situated in the County of Fillmore, State of Minnesota, described as follows:
That part of the SW ¼ NW ¼ of Section 27 and that part of the E ½ SE ¼ NE ¼ of Section 28, all in Township 104 North, Range 10 West, Fillmore County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the NW Corner of said SW ¼ NW ¼ of said Sec. 27; thence North 88° 45’ 28” East (assumed bearing) along the North line said SW ¼ NW ¼, 646.97 feet to the NE Corner of the W ½ SW ¼ NW ¼; thence South 00° 56’ 45” East 458.24 feet to the centerline of the township road running in an easterly-westerly direction through the East half of the SW ¼ NW ¼ ; thence South 67° 12’ 42” East 61.05 feet; thence South 71° 05’ 22” East 107.73 feet; thence South 79° 12’ 11” East 79.95 feet; thence North 64°57’18” East 256.81 feet; thence North 88°45’29” East 178.30 feet to the East line of the East half of the SW ¼ NW ¼ of Section 27-104-10; thence South 1° 10’ 03” East along the East line of the E ½ SW ¼ NW ¼, 972.56 feet to the SE corner of the E ½ SW ¼ NW ¼ of Section 27-104-10; thence South 88° 58’ 13” West along the South line said SW ¼ NW ¼, 390.72 feet to the centerline of the Root River; thence North 53° 59’ 25” West along said centerline of said Root River, 563.29 feet; thence North 24° 07’ 59” West, along said centerline, 166.30 feet; thence North 01° 53’ 38” East along said centerline, 461.49 feet; thence North 68° 49’ 08” West along said centerline, 225.35 feet, thence North 74° 39’ 12” West along said centerline, 171.18 feet; thence South 81° 22’ 08” West along said centerline 395.18 feet; thence South 70° 35’ 18” West along said centerline 200.60 feet; thence South 58° 55’ 37” West along said centerline, 136.32 feet to the West line of said E ½ SE ¼ NE ¼ of said Section 28; thence North 00° 51’ 20” West along said West line of said E ½ SE ¼ NE ¼, 391.54 feet to the NW Corner of said E ½ SE ¼ NE ¼; thence North 89° 05’ 49” East along said North Line of said E ½ SE ¼ NE ¼, 656.78 feet to the point of beginning, subject to easement for a Township Road which runs through the northerly portion thereof; EXCEPTING THEREFROM, that part of the East Half of the SE ¼ of the NE ¼ of Section 28-104-10 lying South of CSAH 21.
The object of this action is to determine that the defendants have no right, title, estate, interest, or lien in or on the above described real estate.
NOTICE OF NO PERSONAL CLAIM
No personal claim is made against any of the defendants in the action above entitled.
MINNESOTA STATUTES SECTION 543.22 STATEMENT: All civil cases are subject to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) processes, except for those actions enumerated in Minnesota Statutes Section 484.76 and Rules 111.01 and 310.01 of the Minnesota General Rules of Practice. More information about the ADR process can be found at Rule 114 of the Minnesota General Rules of Practice.
DATED: October 28, 2004.
David A. Joerg
Attorney for Plaintiff
PO Box 257
Preston MN 55965-1257
(507) 765-3862
Attorney Reg. No. 50404
Publish 8,15,22






