"Where Fillmore County News Comes First"
Friday, May 6th, 2016
Volume ∞ Issue ∞
- 7:43:19, May 5th 2016 - Paul Little - A recent study shows that people who choose to be anonymous are either a ... [Read More]
- 1:56:56, May 5th 2016 - Combat Veteran - Paul: I'm fairly certain I could have a heated debate with your Veter ... [Read More]
- 3:57:39, May 4th 2016 - Paul - Liberal rants are just as worthless as your rightwing rants. Thank you for your ... [Read More]
- 12:33:17, May 3rd 2016 - :) - :) ... [Read More]
- 9:15:44, May 3rd 2016 - Hawkeye63 - Put that into in your pipe and smoke it, Paul!! ... [Read More]
- 10:57:13, May 2nd 2016 - Happy! - The softball girls are soooo relieved! ... [Read More]
- 12:47:26, Apr 30th 2016 - LOLZ - Boy, I'm glad I don't live in SEMEN. ... [Read More]
- 6:37:45, Apr 29th 2016 - SEMN - Really you don't own that sign in! Grow up! I can't stop laughing! Last time I ... [Read More]
- 3:52:31, Apr 29th 2016 - Combat Veteran - @Paul- Where is your "you're a racist, warmongering, hateful, bigot" ... [Read More]
- 8:54:50, Apr 28th 2016 - LOLZ - Some dough head is using my name. I couldn't care less about the school, my ki ... [Read More]
Fri, Nov 11th, 2005
Posted in Commentary
Posted in Commentary
The recently concluded election highlights the problems the state faces in funding education. On Tuesday, more than 80 school districts throughout Minnesota put levy referendums to their voters; another 26 districts had bond referendums. This included three local schools, two of which - Mabel-Canton and Fillmore Central - had operating levies approved by voters; Kingsland School Districtís bond referendum was voted down.
Nearly one out of three school districts in Minnesota was seeking local tax help with education last Tuesday. This despite the legislature putting new money into K-12 education during the last legislative session. But the problem is not in total state funding dollars made available for education, but in each districtís enrollment numbers. Per pupil funding, the formula used by the state to fund education, works well if your district is growing. But if your district has declining student numbers, then your school is going to have less money to work with, regardless of what the legislature has done. This is especially critical in rural Minnesota, where population demographics indicate that the number of youth are in decline. A year ago, state demographer Tom Gillaspy predicted that the number of high school age children in Fillmore County would decline over the next 10 years by 16%. That means that every district in Fillmore County will have less students in the future and can expect to receive less money in per pupil funding to educate their youth. For a school district, a decline of 10 students can mean the loss of a teacher or postponing the purchase of necessary educational resources. That is why so many districts are going to voters with operating levys - to offset the revenues lost in per pupil funding. It is time for our state leaders to ask whether we can allow our rural schools to decline further. We need new ways of looking at the problem of how we fund rural schools. And it needs to happen now.