"Where Fillmore County News Comes First"
Friday, December 13th, 2013
Volume ∞ Issue ∞
- 5:40:17, Dec 4th 2013 - Kiko - I feel the pain for anybody feeling the effects of this health care law. On th ... [Read More]
- 7:55:33, Dec 3rd 2013 - quail - I visited Austin's Goat Farm about 8 years ago when I was a patient at the nea ... [Read More]
- 3:29:59, Nov 27th 2013 - Eric - Good Website ... [Read More]
- 8:44:28, Nov 19th 2013 - bwenthold - The author's insight reflects her vision of the world. I enjoyed this ar ... [Read More]
- 7:13:48, Nov 19th 2013 - - Colin's custom work is of the highest quality. He continues to produce unique prod ... [Read More]
- 2:53:19, Nov 18th 2013 - mark scheevel - paul, you have said it all! it is truly an event that we as parents w ... [Read More]
- 11:50:51, Nov 12th 2013 - Sharon Rustad - Mr. Kues: Just for the record the invitation to join the Task For ... [Read More]
- 12:04:51, Nov 10th 2013 - firstname.lastname@example.org - In response to Mrs. Neyhuis' response, you put an interesti ... [Read More]
- 8:39:45, Nov 6th 2013 - cbothun1234 - I will miss you forever and always lady! You have made such a positive i ... [Read More]
- 3:57:24, Nov 6th 2013 - MNFarmboy - Mr. Kues, the bill you mentioned about the district receiving $20 million ... [Read More]
Fri, Mar 3rd, 2006
Posted in Commentary
Posted in Commentary
Sometimes we print things people don’t like to read. I guess that’s the nature of a newspaper.
Sometimes people don’t like what I write; at other times, they don’t like what others write that we print. And as the point man for the Journal, I am the one who hears about it. That is as it should be. One reader took umbrage with an ad we published last week that advocated impeaching Bush. He couldn’t believe we would print such a thing. I couldn’t figure out why we wouldn’t. Obviously the ad represented an opinion, perhaps a narrow one, that a person or group of persons wanted to express. I could see nothing about the content of the ad that did not have a basis in fact. Many conservatives and liberals alike are uneasy about the administration’s wiretapping activity as well as the president’s support for a Dubai company’s takeover of six U.S. ports. Whether this constitutes high treason or is an impeachable offense is up for debate. The advertisers in this case would like you to believe so. Whenever I call my attorney to ask him to preview an ad or to look up statutes governing disclosure, it usually means that I have been presented with a dilemma: an advertisement that I know will be controversial, one that I know I will probably print, and one that I will hear about, most likely not in a favorable way. Most often, people that agree with an opinion don’t let you know about it. We do get feedback on the articles and opinions that appear in the Journal, both favorable and unfavorable. Most of them make it into print as letters to the editor; personal attacks do not. Perhaps we can all learn something about the opinions of men from one of our great patriots, Benjamin Franklin. In 1731, Franklin wrote an Apology for Printers which appeared in an issue of his Pennsylvania Gazette in response to criticism that he was disrespectful toward religion and the clergy when he published a poster about a shipping meeting that said that no “Sea-Hens” and “Black Gowns” [clergy] would be permitted. Franklin, who was paid five shillings for the job, wrote: Being frequently censur’d and condemn’d by different Persons for printing Things which they say ought not be printed, I have sometimes thought it might be necessary to make a standing Apology for myself, and publish it once a Year, to be read upon all Occasions of that Nature. Franklin went on to point out: •that the opinions of men are almost as various as their faces, as referred to in the proverb - “so many men so many minds;” •that the business of printing has mainly to do with opinions; •that it is unreasonable for any one man to expect to be pleased with everything that is printed; •and that if all printers were determined not to print anything till they were sure it would not offend anybody, very little would be printed. Franklin wrote: ...It is unreasonable to imagine Printers approve of every thing they print, and to censure them on any particular thing accordingly... Franklin was a great printer and publisher of his day. His satirical lesson about freedom of speech, Apology for Printers, still has relevance 265 years later.